Write an article about When it comes to AI, research shows stark contrasts between national approaches, with only 13 out of 50 countries giving high priority to training their workforce in the tech. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS: There’s no doubt that artificial intelligence will profoundly transform the job market in the coming decades. But how are individual governments preparing for this revolution?
US research, published in the Human Resource Development Review, reveals stark contrasts between national approaches, with only 13 out of 50 countries giving high priority to training their workforce in AI.
This research analyses the national AI strategies of 50 countries, focusing on their education and vocational training policies. Reports estimate that nearly half of today’s jobs could disappear within 20 years, while 65% of today’s students will work in jobs that do not yet exist.
However, not everyone around the world is preparing for this challenge in the same way. Lehong Shi, a researcher at the University of Georgia, demonstrated this by ranking the most advanced countries in AI training.
To do so, the expert uses six evaluation criteria: national plan objectives; methods for achieving them; examples of concrete projects; indicators of success; support mechanisms; and implementation timelines.
The analysis reveals that 11 European countries are among the 13 nations that place a high priority on AI training, alongside Mexico and Australia. This dominance can be explained by a European tradition of lifelong learning, and larger budgets allocated to training and education.
The United States ranks in the intermediate category, along with 22 other countries that consider AI training to be a medium-level priority.
Despite these differences, there are some areas of convergence. Almost all the countries studied plan to create or improve university programmes specialising in AI. Many are also interested in teaching AI in primary and secondary schools.
Plus, more than half of the countries are focusing on in-company training, with sector-specific programmes or specialised internships. However, few are focusing on vulnerable populations such as seniors or jobseekers, which reflects national strategic choices.
It is hoped that the findings will encourage less-advanced nations to rethink education to prepare their citizens to coexist with artificial intelligence. (Envato Elements pic)
“Just because a country gives less prioritisation to education and workforce preparation, it doesn’t mean AI isn’t on its radar,” Shi noted. Indeed, some Asian countries are focusing more on national security and health.
Comprehensive strategies
To prepare tomorrow’s workers, several countries are adopting a comprehensive approach to AI-skills development. Germany, for example, is focusing on creating a culture that encourages interest in the tech. Spain is going even further by teaching the basics of AI in preschool.
Such early initiatives are aimed at preparing future generations for a transformed world of work. However, these efforts have their limitations.
“Human soft skills, such as creativity, collaboration and communication cannot be replaced by AI. And they were only mentioned by a few countries,” Shi observed.
Indeed, developing soft skills appears essential to ensuring workers retain their place in an increasingly automated professional environment. These shortcomings reflect a reductive and overly technical view of preparing for AI, which neglects the human dimension of work.
In other words, the world is moving at different speeds when it comes to AI. While some European countries are developing ambitious and structured approaches, other nations risk falling behind.
Shi hopes the findings of this study will encourage countries that are less advanced in this field to rethink their approach. The challenge goes far beyond technical training and requires a complete rethinking of education to prepare citizens to coexist with artificial intelligence.
Ultimately, AI will transform work – but it is humans who will decide how.
in 1000-1500 words .Organize the content with appropriate headings and subheadings (h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6), Retain any existing tags from
When it comes to AI, research shows stark contrasts between national approaches, with only 13 out of 50 countries giving high priority to training their workforce in the tech. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS: There’s no doubt that artificial intelligence will profoundly transform the job market in the coming decades. But how are individual governments preparing for this revolution?
US research, published in the Human Resource Development Review, reveals stark contrasts between national approaches, with only 13 out of 50 countries giving high priority to training their workforce in AI.
This research analyses the national AI strategies of 50 countries, focusing on their education and vocational training policies. Reports estimate that nearly half of today’s jobs could disappear within 20 years, while 65% of today’s students will work in jobs that do not yet exist.
However, not everyone around the world is preparing for this challenge in the same way. Lehong Shi, a researcher at the University of Georgia, demonstrated this by ranking the most advanced countries in AI training.
To do so, the expert uses six evaluation criteria: national plan objectives; methods for achieving them; examples of concrete projects; indicators of success; support mechanisms; and implementation timelines.
The analysis reveals that 11 European countries are among the 13 nations that place a high priority on AI training, alongside Mexico and Australia. This dominance can be explained by a European tradition of lifelong learning, and larger budgets allocated to training and education.
The United States ranks in the intermediate category, along with 22 other countries that consider AI training to be a medium-level priority.
Despite these differences, there are some areas of convergence. Almost all the countries studied plan to create or improve university programmes specialising in AI. Many are also interested in teaching AI in primary and secondary schools.
Plus, more than half of the countries are focusing on in-company training, with sector-specific programmes or specialised internships. However, few are focusing on vulnerable populations such as seniors or jobseekers, which reflects national strategic choices.
It is hoped that the findings will encourage less-advanced nations to rethink education to prepare their citizens to coexist with artificial intelligence. (Envato Elements pic)
“Just because a country gives less prioritisation to education and workforce preparation, it doesn’t mean AI isn’t on its radar,” Shi noted. Indeed, some Asian countries are focusing more on national security and health.
Comprehensive strategies
To prepare tomorrow’s workers, several countries are adopting a comprehensive approach to AI-skills development. Germany, for example, is focusing on creating a culture that encourages interest in the tech. Spain is going even further by teaching the basics of AI in preschool.
Such early initiatives are aimed at preparing future generations for a transformed world of work. However, these efforts have their limitations.
“Human soft skills, such as creativity, collaboration and communication cannot be replaced by AI. And they were only mentioned by a few countries,” Shi observed.
Indeed, developing soft skills appears essential to ensuring workers retain their place in an increasingly automated professional environment. These shortcomings reflect a reductive and overly technical view of preparing for AI, which neglects the human dimension of work.
In other words, the world is moving at different speeds when it comes to AI. While some European countries are developing ambitious and structured approaches, other nations risk falling behind.
Shi hopes the findings of this study will encourage countries that are less advanced in this field to rethink their approach. The challenge goes far beyond technical training and requires a complete rethinking of education to prepare citizens to coexist with artificial intelligence.
Ultimately, AI will transform work – but it is humans who will decide how.
and integrate them seamlessly into the new content without adding new tags. Include conclusion section and FAQs section at the end. do not include the title. it must return only article i dont want any extra information or introductory text with article e.g: ” Here is rewritten article:” or “Here is the rewritten content:”