Write an article about Eating more slowly can be encouraged with structured, varied meals, eaten with cutlery. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS: Wolfing down food too quickly is not without consequences for your health. Indeed, this eating habit is linked to an increased risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease and even certain types of cancer.
But do you really need to force yourself to slow down, or could you simply structure your meals differently?
Researchers at Japan’s Fujita Health University set out to investigate.
Over a 12-week period, they monitored 41 adults, all members of the university staff, and gave them three types of meal.
These were either a slice of pizza warmed in the microwave, eaten by hand, or bentos consisting of rice, broccoli and chopped steak, eaten with chopsticks – sometimes starting with the vegetables, then sometimes saving them for last.
The scientists’ aim was to find out whether the speed with which one eats depends more on the type of food they eat or the order in which they eat it.
Their findings, published in the journal Nutrients, speak for themselves.
Bento meals resulted in significantly longer chewing times than pizza, regardless of whether the vegetables were eaten first or last.
On average, participants took 182 to 216 seconds longer to finish their bento. In other words, it wasn’t the order in which the food was eaten that slowed the pace, but rather the format of the meal.
But that’s not all. The bentos also encouraged participants to chew more often and faster – without changing the number of bites.
This appears to have happened because a compartmentalised meal, served with utensils and composed of a variety of foods, naturally encourages people to slow down.
Clearly, a meal that requires a certain level of effort is a meal that can be enjoyed more slowly.
The scientists found no association between body mass index and meal duration. On the other hand, age and male sex seem to be associated with faster mealtimes.
Much more than one’s personal self-discipline, it could be the format of a meal – its composition, its presentation, the way it’s eaten – that influences how quickly one eats it.
So, rather than forcing yourself to slow down, it could be a question of giving yourself the means to do so naturally.
In short, eating more slowly isn’t (just) a matter of self-control: it’s a choice that starts in the kitchen.
It means foregoing quick, on-the-go meals and favouring structured, varied meals, eaten with cutlery. This could well be one of the simplest and most effective tools to combat overeating.
Indeed, eating better could actually be a question of eating differently – taking your time, savouring each mouthful and sharing a moment with friends or family, for example.
Reframing mealtimes in this way could help foster a more conscious, more serene and healthier way of eating.
in 1000-1500 words .Organize the content with appropriate headings and subheadings (h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6), Retain any existing tags from
Eating more slowly can be encouraged with structured, varied meals, eaten with cutlery. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS: Wolfing down food too quickly is not without consequences for your health. Indeed, this eating habit is linked to an increased risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease and even certain types of cancer.
But do you really need to force yourself to slow down, or could you simply structure your meals differently?
Researchers at Japan’s Fujita Health University set out to investigate.
Over a 12-week period, they monitored 41 adults, all members of the university staff, and gave them three types of meal.
These were either a slice of pizza warmed in the microwave, eaten by hand, or bentos consisting of rice, broccoli and chopped steak, eaten with chopsticks – sometimes starting with the vegetables, then sometimes saving them for last.
The scientists’ aim was to find out whether the speed with which one eats depends more on the type of food they eat or the order in which they eat it.
Their findings, published in the journal Nutrients, speak for themselves.
Bento meals resulted in significantly longer chewing times than pizza, regardless of whether the vegetables were eaten first or last.
On average, participants took 182 to 216 seconds longer to finish their bento. In other words, it wasn’t the order in which the food was eaten that slowed the pace, but rather the format of the meal.
But that’s not all. The bentos also encouraged participants to chew more often and faster – without changing the number of bites.
This appears to have happened because a compartmentalised meal, served with utensils and composed of a variety of foods, naturally encourages people to slow down.
Clearly, a meal that requires a certain level of effort is a meal that can be enjoyed more slowly.
The scientists found no association between body mass index and meal duration. On the other hand, age and male sex seem to be associated with faster mealtimes.
Much more than one’s personal self-discipline, it could be the format of a meal – its composition, its presentation, the way it’s eaten – that influences how quickly one eats it.
So, rather than forcing yourself to slow down, it could be a question of giving yourself the means to do so naturally.
In short, eating more slowly isn’t (just) a matter of self-control: it’s a choice that starts in the kitchen.
It means foregoing quick, on-the-go meals and favouring structured, varied meals, eaten with cutlery. This could well be one of the simplest and most effective tools to combat overeating.
Indeed, eating better could actually be a question of eating differently – taking your time, savouring each mouthful and sharing a moment with friends or family, for example.
Reframing mealtimes in this way could help foster a more conscious, more serene and healthier way of eating.
and integrate them seamlessly into the new content without adding new tags. Include conclusion section and FAQs section at the end. do not include the title. it must return only article i dont want any extra information or introductory text with article e.g: ” Here is rewritten article:” or “Here is the rewritten content:”