DAP’s Teresa Kok Defends Decision Not to Report Former Officer to MACC
PETALING JAYA: DAP’s Teresa Kok has defended her decision not to report her former officer to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) after discovering alleged misappropriation of funds for her constituency, following criticisms by a former MCA vice-president.
Criticisms by MCA’s Ti Lian Ker
Ti Lian Ker, a former MCA vice-president, questioned Kok’s integrity, accountability, and responsibility for not reporting the matter to MACC, saying it was a breach of the principles of good governance and democracy. He also urged DAP to walk the talk on accountability and transparency, as it had touted these values in the past.
Kok’s Response
Kok, the Seputeh MP, defended her decision, saying that she had raised concerns about the rationale behind the federal territory education department’s request for and provision of smartboards for schools in Kuala Lumpur. She reiterated that her speech in Parliament was published in full on her social media platforms for transparency and public record. Kok also expressed her soft spot for her former aide, despite terminating his service, stating that she saw him grow up and he had worked for her for more than 10 years.
Previous Defence by Lim Kit Siang
Earlier, Lim Kit Siang, a DAP stalwart, came to Kok’s defence, saying it would be unfortunate if the investigation into her former aides diminished her chances at the upcoming elections on March 16. He also expressed his support for Kok’s decision to sack her former officer, citing the importance of accountability and transparency.
Background
Kok had raised concerns about the alleged misappropriation of funds for her constituency, which led to the termination of her former aide’s service. The incident sparked controversy, with some party members and the families of her former staff blaming her for MACC’s decision to question her two former officers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Teresa Kok’s decision not to report her former officer to MACC has been met with criticisms from MCA’s Ti Lian Ker, who questioned her integrity and accountability. However, Kok has defended her decision, citing her concerns about the rationale behind the federal territory education department’s request for and provision of smartboards for schools in Kuala Lumpur. The controversy has sparked a debate on accountability and transparency, highlighting the importance of upholding these values in politics.
FAQs
Q: What was the controversy surrounding Teresa Kok’s former officer?
A: Allegations of misappropriation of funds for her constituency led to the termination of her former aide’s service.
Q: What was Teresa Kok’s response to the criticisms?
A: She defended her decision, citing her concerns about the rationale behind the federal territory education department’s request for and provision of smartboards for schools in Kuala Lumpur.
Q: What is the significance of this controversy?
A: It highlights the importance of accountability and transparency in politics, and the need for leaders to uphold these values in their actions.