Monday, March 10, 2025
No menu items!

Security guard faces charges for illegal weapon possession

Must Read

A Security Guard Pleads Not Guilty to Unlawful Possession of Machetes

Background of the Case

A security guard, Nik Azahar Mohamed, 51, pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court in Kota Bharu to a charge of unlawful possession of dangerous weapons, namely three machetes. The incident occurred two days ago at Taman KUB, Kampung Chica, Kubang Kerian, where Nik Azahar was found in possession of three machetes measuring 51 centimetres (cm), 60 cm, and 62 cm.

The Charge

The charge was framed under Section 7(1) of the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Dangerous Weapons Act 1958, which carries a penalty of up to 10 years imprisonment, if convicted. This section prohibits the possession of dangerous weapons, including machetes, without a valid license or authorization.

Bail Application

Deputy Public Prosecutor Kamarul Hasyime Rosli did not offer any bail, citing the seriousness of the offense. However, defense counsel Muhammad Husni Mubarak Ghazali appealed for a low bail, citing that the accused works part-time with a monthly income of RM700, supports a wife and a young child, and has health issues.

Bail Granted

Judge Zulkifli Abdullah allowed bail at RM8,000 with one surety and set Feb 25 for the case mention and document submission. The judge took into account the accused’s employment and family commitments, as well as his health issues, before granting bail.

Conclusion

The case highlights the importance of ensuring public safety and security by preventing the unauthorized possession of dangerous weapons. The prosecution’s refusal to offer bail underscores the seriousness of the offense and the need for strict punishment to deter similar incidents in the future.

FAQs

Q: What was the accused charged with?
A: Nik Azahar Mohamed was charged with unlawful possession of three machetes.

Q: What is the penalty for the offense?
A: The penalty for the offense is up to 10 years imprisonment, if convicted.

Q: Did the prosecution offer bail?
A: No, the prosecution did not offer bail, citing the seriousness of the offense.

Q: Did the defense appeal for bail?
A: Yes, the defense counsel appealed for a low bail, citing the accused’s employment, family commitments, and health issues.

Q: Was bail granted?
A: Yes, bail was granted at RM8,000 with one surety and set Feb 25 for the case mention and document submission.

Latest News

What’s holding back the Political Funding Bill?

Write an article about What’s holding back the Political Funding Bill? .Organize the content with appropriate headings and subheadings...

More Articles Like This