Assessment of Ministerial Performance: A Call for Inclusivity and Transparency
PETALING JAYA
A Sarawak minister has come under fire for criticizing a survey evaluating the performance of Dayak ministers and deputy ministers, which he deemed "biased and unfair". Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah, the Sarawak tourism, creative industry and performing arts minister, questioned the motive behind the poll conducted by Academy of Sciences Malaysia fellow Jayum Jawan, as reported by Borneo Post.
Selective Evaluation or Agenda-Driven?
Karim expressed concern over the selective approach taken by the pollster, targeting only Dayak ministers and deputy ministers. "Why do you identify only Dayak ministers and deputy ministers?" he asked. "If you want to do an assessment, do it for everyone – the Malays and Chinese." He suggested that there was an agenda behind the "selective evaluation", and that the survey was not representative of the broader population.
Methodology and Sample Size
Karim also took issue with the reported sample size of 183 respondents, which he deemed a "significant flaw" in the survey. He questioned the pollster’s methodology, suggesting that the test group may have been chosen based on personal biases, and that friends of the pollster who were anti-government would naturally have negative opinions.
Timing and Motive
The minister further questioned the timing of the survey, believing it to be linked to the upcoming state election. "We are close to the election and such findings could unfairly undermine the credibility of the ministers and the premier’s selection for the Cabinet," he said, adding that it was inappropriate to single out Dayak ministers.
Reactions from Dayak Deputy Ministers
Yesterday, New Straits Times reported that some Dayak deputy ministers in the state government reacted negatively to the ratings, questioning the methodology and criteria used in the survey. They expressed concern over the lack of transparency and accountability in the assessment process.
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding the survey highlights the need for a more inclusive and transparent approach to evaluating ministerial performance. Karim’s criticism serves as a reminder that any assessment should be comprehensive, covering all ministers and deputy ministers, including those of different ethnic backgrounds. As the country gears up for the state election, it is essential to maintain a fair and balanced approach to evaluating the performance of public officials.
FAQs
- What is the purpose of the survey?
The survey aims to evaluate the performance of Dayak ministers and deputy ministers. - Who conducted the survey?
Academy of Sciences Malaysia fellow Jayum Jawan conducted the survey. - What are the concerns raised by Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah?
He questioned the motive behind the survey, the sample size, and the methodology used, suggesting that the pollster may have chosen a biased test group. - What is the response from Dayak deputy ministers?
Some Dayak deputy ministers have expressed concern over the lack of transparency and accountability in the assessment process, questioning the methodology and criteria used in the survey.