Tak Jawab Salah, Jawab Pula Dituduh
The Prime Minister’s Question Time (PMQT) session in Parliament recently saw a heated debate over the "adendum" or additional documents related to the case of former Prime Minister Najib Razak, who is currently serving a 12-year jail sentence for corruption. The debate centered on whether the government was hiding the truth about the adendum and whether it was a scandalous act.
The Prime Minister’s Stance
Prime Minister Hishamuddin Aun was asked by an MP from the Perikatan Nasional (PN) party, Takiyuddin Hassan, whether the government was hiding the truth about the adendum. Hishamuddin responded by saying that he would not comment on the matter, citing the need to respect the court’s decision and avoid subjudice. He also emphasized that he was not a member of the Royal Pardon Board, which would need to be involved in the process of reviewing the adendum.
The Law and Order
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had previously urged all parties to refrain from making statements that could be seen as subjudic, as the case is still ongoing. The AGC also emphasized that only the court could decide on the adendum, and that the government would need to respect the court’s decision.
The Opposition’s Stance
The opposition parties, on the other hand, accused the government of hiding the truth and of being irresponsible in their handling of the adendum. They claimed that the government was trying to cover up the scandal and that this was a betrayal of the public’s trust.
The Conclusion
In conclusion, the debate on the adendum has highlighted the need for transparency and accountability in government. While the Prime Minister has emphasized the need to respect the court’s decision, the opposition parties have accused the government of hiding the truth. The public is left to wonder what the truth is, and what the consequences will be for those involved.
FAQs
Q: What is the adendum?
A: The adendum is a set of additional documents related to the case of former Prime Minister Najib Razak, who is currently serving a 12-year jail sentence for corruption.
Q: Why is the government not commenting on the adendum?
A: The government is citing the need to respect the court’s decision and avoid subjudice, as the case is still ongoing.
Q: What is the opposition’s stance on the adendum?
A: The opposition parties have accused the government of hiding the truth and of being irresponsible in their handling of the adendum.
Q: What are the consequences for those involved in the adendum?
A: The consequences for those involved in the adendum are still unclear, as the case is still ongoing and the court has yet to decide on the adendum.